Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [orbit-dev] Continue to require ATO CQs?

Hi Roland,


Thank you for the clarification. The motive for adding this is that ANTLR 3 and ANTLR 4 are fundamentally different and incompatible: even the package names are different. 3.5.2 is the latest version of ANTLR 3 (it actually released after ANTLR 4), and ANTLR3 is still widely used.

So to be clear, for the time being any non-PB CQ will do, until the EBR plugin is update to remove the mandatory CQ field and the website is updated to remove the “Orbit CQ” column?





From: Roland Grunberg
Sent: 17 April 2020 15:18
To: Orbit Developer discussion
Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Continue to require ATO CQs?


On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:23 PM Sina Madani <sinadoom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification. I’m just working through adding a bundle now, and I noticed that the in orbit-recipes also needs updating. However for ip_log.xml it appears that the <ipzilla bug_id> element is still mandatory under <legal>. Can I just pick any CQ from IPZilla that has been approved for the bundle I’m adding (there are multiple, since in the past every project had to submit a separate CQ for the same bundle) and use that as the reference? I’m currently adding ANTLR 3.5.2 runtime [1].


I see the latest version of antlr.runtime we have is 4.7.2, so the

first  thing to

address is : do we really need to introduce a much older version ? We

already have a 3.x version that would probably be removed eventually.


With that said, there are quite a few CQs but subtle differences to them. The

CQs with the term "PB CQ .." are requests for projects that didn't

file the initial

request to use the specified library. This type of request will be going away.


You'd want to use either CQ 14556, which is for antlr-tool 3.5.2, or

CQ 9433, which is for antlr-runtime 3.5.2. If neither of those existed, the

library actually seems to be on clearlydefined : .



Roland Grunberg



orbit-dev mailing list


To unsubscribe from this list, visit


Back to the top