Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [orbit-dev] Let's promote another S build on Monday afternoon?


Glad you asked ... it'll happen as soon as I get shell access back to the build machine.
I've sent note to webmaster (and filled out subsequently announced form on portal, etc.).

If it helps,
The build we will promote is the one at
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/committers/drops/S20080209163815/
that is, the bits will be the same ... but, through out, the 'committers' in the URL will change to 'downloads' for the
more permanent URL.

Thanks,





From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 02/11/2008 08:43 PM
Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] Let's promote another S build on Monday afternoon?





Sorry for being a nag, but it's 5:45pm pacific time on Monday.  Is this
still going to happen today (2/11/2008)?

Christian Damus wrote:
> Hi, David,
>
> Sounds good to me!  This should mean that users who step up (using Update
> Manager) from the M4 Ganymede to M5 will not be hosed by the ensuing
> replication of Batik bundles.  Some products that I know of are not
> susceptible to this because they use the platform.xml facility of
> enumeration the individual bundles in the configuration.
>
> I'm fairly certain that the Platform doesn't use Batik.  Too bad; I should
> have liked to preserve EMF's reputation as the M5a instigator for another
> year.  :-D
>
> cW
>
>
>
>
> Christian W. Damus
> Component Lead, Eclipse OCL and EMF MQ/MT/VF
> IBM Rational Sofware
>
>
>                                                                            
>              David M Williams                                              
>              <david_williams@u                                            
>              s.ibm.com>                                                 To
>              Sent by:                  Orbit Developer discussion          
>              orbit-dev-bounces         <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>            
>              @eclipse.org                                               cc
>                                                                            
>                                                                    Subject
>              02/09/2008 12:03          [orbit-dev] Let's promote another S
>              AM                        build on Monday afternoon?          
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
>              Please respond to                                            
>               Orbit Developer                                              
>                 discussion                                                
>              <orbit-dev@eclips                                            
>                   e.org>                                                  
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
>
>
>
>
>
> around 3 PM Eastern?
>
> I checked, and the only things that have changed in map files, since last
> S-build, are the two issues that have been talked about .... Batik and
> ch.ethz.iks.slp.
>
> And, Batik does consist of 13 bundles (26 if you count source) so ... I
> think that might deserve "S" status, I think there's at least 3 projects
> that use Batik and will have to make sure they get the latest versions,
> after Monday's S-build.
>
> Let's say that's the plan unless anyone has a counter proposal or
> objection?
>
> So ... Orbiteers ... please don't release anything else to the map files,
> so I won't have to mess with branching. Unless it is blocking someone's
> delivery of M5.
>
> Hopefully the Platform doesn't use Batik ... or, there's your M5a :)
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>                                                                            
>  From:     David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS                              
>                                                                            
>  To:       Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>              
>                                                                            
>  Date:     02/08/2008 09:54 PM                                            
>                                                                            
>  Subject:  Re: [orbit-dev] Promote Orbit I build to pick up recent        
>            addition/fix?                                                  
>                                                                            
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ok ... if we are going to re-do the Batik bundles, I think we might want to
> produce another S-build, instead of I-build,
> since those bundles are shared by many projects, so I think we may need a
> more "official" build. ... to help increase
> the odds of everyone using the right build for their milestone build.
>
> At worst, we might have to do a "branched build" to include only things
> that are intended to be changed. But,
> I'm not sure anyone has changed much else anyway?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>                                                                            
>  From:     Christian Damus <cdamus@xxxxxxxxxx>                            
>                                                                            
>  To:       Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>              
>                                                                            
>  Date:     02/08/2008 07:22 PM                                            
>                                                                            
>  Subject:  Re: [orbit-dev] Promote Orbit I build to pick up recent        
>            addition/fix?                                                  
>                                                                            
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi, Scott,
>
> I certainly wouldn't mind piggy-backing my
> multiple-installed-builds-of-Batik-bundles-cause-class-loading-problems fix
> on your I-build!
>
> :-)
>
>
https://bugs.eclipse.org/214410
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
> Christian W. Damus
> Component Lead, Eclipse OCL and EMF MQ/MT/VF
> IBM Rational Sofware
>
>
>
>            Scott Lewis
>            <slewis@composent
>            .com>                                                      To
>            Sent by:                  orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>            orbit-dev-bounces                                          cc
>            @eclipse.org
>                                                                  Subject
>                                      [orbit-dev] Promote Orbit I build
>            02/08/2008 06:33          to pick up recent addition/fix?
>            PM
>
>
>            Please respond to
>             Orbit Developer
>               discussion
>            <orbit-dev@eclips
>                 e.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I would like to request promoting an Orbit I build to the downloads page
> in order to pick up recent fixes for ECF M5.
>
> If you want more details see below.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:           Re: Orbit respin?
> Date:              Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:13:26 -0500
> From:              David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To:          Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC:          Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> References:              <47ACDEC9.9010407@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
> In theory it could, but
>
> 1. should ask on orbit-dev list so everyone can weigh in
>
> 2. the problem with having another stable build is then there's some
> confusion about which one people should use ... the one we said to use,
> or the most recent.
>
> 3. It's much easier to promote a new I-build ... then you can rely on
> that URL until the next S build, so not that much stress on you.
>
> 4. Kind of an aside, but do you know if there are other clients of this
> bundle?
>
> So .... I suggest you request (on orbit-dev, to set a good example :)
> that an I-build be promoted to the downloads page, so you have the
> stable URL for M5.
> Sound ok?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> From:              Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:          David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc:          Chris Aniszczyk/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> Date:              02/08/2008 05:59 PM
> Subject:           Orbit respin?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> The jSLP bundle (ch.ethz.iks.slp_1.0.0
> <
>
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/S20080203062035/bundles/ch.ethz.iks.slp_1.0.0.RC2_v200802011126.jar
>
>  
>> )
>>    
>
> was recently added to Orbit and I see that it was included in the Feb 3
> build:
>
>
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/S20080203062035/
>
> We discovered this week that there was a build problem that makes it
> unusable for us.  Chris A has since fixed the problem, and we would like
> to use the Orbit-provided bundle in our build as soon as possible (so
> that we can deploy jSLP with ECF M5).
>
> Could an Orbit 'stable' build be done with the latest contents?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>  

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev


Back to the top