|Re: [microprofile-wg] MP Committer questions|
As the member representative for a MicroProfile working group participant, Jan can designate a Participant Representative (committer) on the MicroProfile Specification Project as described in the Eclipse Foundation Specification Process.
I'll initiate the committer paperwork process. You should receive an email with instructions, Jan.
Jan, with what member of the EF staff have "tried to fix that" with? AFAICT, no request has been received by the EMO, so I'd like to circle back and make sure that our staff understands where to direct folks with these sorts of requests.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 4:15 PM Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe EMO might be able to help with this. EMO, can you please help Jan with the committer status query detailed below for MP community?ThanksEmily
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 4:16 PM Jan Westerkamp <jan.westerkamp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
one small correction: My vote is a binding vote because I am a Committer by role (iJUG representative).
However, this is not reflected correctly in a lot of MPWG places and need to be fixed at some point - but my tries to fix that with EF staff and/or MP self-management where not successful until now... ;-)
Am 03.08.22 um 23:34 schrieb Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg:
Thank you all for casting your votes on this subject! The voting period has ended. Below are the results.
Option B:Binding vote: 7Non-binging vote: 6
Option A:Non-bing vote: 1 (via microrprofile-wg mailing list)
I declare the winning option is Option B: Use OTel property. MicroProfile Telemetry team can proceed with Option B and make corresponding updates to reflect the vote.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 8:35 PM F Wong <fmhwong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd choose option B as it is easier to use.
--On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 8:46:37 AM UTC-4 Emily Jiang wrote:
Context: MicroProfile Telemetry wants to disable OpenTelemetry unless end users want to enable OpenTelemetry explicitly. In doing so, it needs to use a configuration to enable/disable OpenTelemetry.
Do we want to define our own property mp.telemetry.enabled or use the property name from OTel (otel.experimental.sdk.enabled, the property name will be renamed to otel.sdk.enabled eventually)?
There are a couple of options:Option A: Define our own property mp.telemetry.enabled
Option B: Use OTel property
We could not reach agreement on which option to choose despite of a few meeting discussions in MicroProfile Telemetry calls and MicroProfile Technical calls. Therefore, a vote is needed to settle this.
There are cons/pros for the above option. Please refer to this doc for the full lists of cons/pros before you cast your vote.The vote will run for 7 days and will conclude on 3rd August. Only the votes from MicroProfile Committers will be counted towards the result as the binding votes. However, MicroProfile non-committers are welcome to vote as well and votes will be non-binding votes.
Please just vote on this thread. No discussion please. All discussions are to happen on the thread [DISUSSION] Configure MicroProfile Telemetry
Please vote in the format of
Option ? (while ? is either A or B)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microprofile+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/11b98872-5d60-4659-813e-a66e610c89fan%40googlegroups.com.
_______________________________________________ microprofile-wg mailing list microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
microprofile-wg mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation
Back to the top