Re: [microprofile-wg] MicroProfile Working Group repository & approved S

[Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>]

I switched the PR for adding a checklist to the microprofile project into an issue template:

https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile/pull/193

Should I move it over?

Going the route of a pure metadata type of submission that is used to generate website or other materials is something that I was starting to look at for jakarta.ee where we do pull the PR directly in. The Hugo engine there supports yaml, md, maybe even json.

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 3:00 PM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A potential proposal on other ways we could use this repository.

Perhaps we may want to do PRs against this repo for our specification process.  The data we collect would basically be the minimum metadata we would need for designers/marketing to update the website or create other materials.  The format we collect it in would be something they can understand: probably either plain text or maybe yaml.


--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On Oct 20, 2020, at 12:54 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Based on the meeting today, I created the `microprofile-wg` repository to host the approved MicroProfile Specification Process 1.0.
>
> - https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg
> - https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/blob/main/mpsp.adoc
>
> I've added some language to try to make it crystal clear how this repo and documents therein relate to other online sources.
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>

_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg