| [mdt-papyrus.dev] [Fwd: RE: [modeling-pmc] Project planning] |
|
Just for information. Today, Papyrus isn't identified to be include in Galileo. I think it's normal because no beta version is still available, and we don't have a clean roadmap. But if we want to propose a first version for Galileo, we need to discuss with Kenn before the end of December to choice to target or not Eclipse 3.5. todo .... -------- Message original --------
I did a rolled-up plan for MDT - see http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=modeling.mdt. I'm not how easy it would be to automate a roll-up like this, but it was easy to put together. It also helped us to achieve consistent themes among the MDT components... Kenn Hussey Program Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com 82 Peter Street, Second Floor | Toronto, ON M5V 2G5 Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mobile: 613-301-9105 -----Original Message----- From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ed Merks Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:11 AM To: PMC members mailing list Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc] Project planning Rich, I'm not sure it's a rule or a guideline. :-P I just wanted to be sure that the things I for which I'm directly responsible, EMF Core, SDO, and XSD, did things in a consistent way. Kenn asked for this flag for MDT, and that's where XSD lives, so I wanted to follow this same convention for EMF Core and SDO. As a result, I also wanted all the EMF and EMFT components to be consistent with that as well. It seems like a pretty sound approach and no one complained! I'm not doing a rolled up EMF or EMFT plan because I was hoping that whatever technology is developed to roll up plans could also be used to roll up the various EMF and EMFT component plans into rolled up plans, then recursively to create a modeling project rolled up plan, and finally an overall Eclipse plan... Richard Gronback wrote: > I guess this never came up at the PMC level, but are we expecting each > Modeling project to use the galileo flag for planning? > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Project_Plan/Modeling_Project > > Also, should we attempt a rollup of plans for Modeling overall? The > Planning Council will need to provide some form of rollup for the community, > but we're not sure what that will look like yet. It's a future topic, so I > figured I'd solicit feedback from Modeling... Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Rich > > > _______________________________________________ > modeling-pmc mailing list > modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc > _______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc _______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc |
begin:vcard fn:Etienne Juliot n:Juliot;Etienne org:Obeo adr;quoted-printable:;;2 rue Robert Schuman;Rez=C3=A9;;44400;France email;internet:etienne.juliot@xxxxxxx tel;work:02 51 13 55 94 tel;fax:02 51 70 04 69 tel;pager:etienne.juliot@xxxxxxxxxx tel;cell:06 86 78 14 82 url:http://www.obeo.fr version:2.1 end:vcard