a) So we can release a milestone release soon. Is it ok if we
release in 1 or 2 week ?
Waiting I advice you to integrate the master branch in
development and report us if there is any trouble.
b) About the 1.0.0 version, we works on this, but we are not able
to give you a date. We are more in a "debian release spirit" : the
1.0.0 version will be out when it will be ready. Milestones
release is usable we use it in production. We use milestones
because API could change between 2 milestones releases. This is
not ideal but I can not see another way.
About the less frequent release, don't worry Leshan is an
active project. There was no milestones release because there was
no need until now and also because we was focus on
Californium(CoAP stack) too.
Do not hesitate to manifest your self when you need a
milestone release.
c) About roadmap, we currently have no roadmap but :
Opened issues and mainly opened PR should give you an insight
of what will be the near future of Leshan.
We could see here what are the supported feature [1] and so
what is missing.
Even if this is not set in stone, SMS and Bootstrap Server
initiated are probably out of the scope of the 1.0.0 version.
Object versioning, Server side Queue Mode, RPK+X509 at client
side, ACL for bootstrap server seems to be features needed by
community.
Why we have no roadmap ? because we prefer to adapt ourself to
users input. So if there are subjects you want to move forward
please let us know or even better contribute to the project.
HTH
[1] https://github.com/eclipse/leshan/wiki/LWM2M-Supported-features
Le 11/01/2018 à 09:34, Elias
Weingärtner a écrit :
Hi Ian, Hi Simon,
first of all thank you for your quick clarifications.
I was asking for a roadmap for two particular reasons.
a) I've seen recent certain changes on the master branch
that would be of interest for us. They are not part of the
last milestone. More specifically, I've seen that Observe
support for Instance Enablers has been integrated in October,
and this would be highly beneficial for our ongoing
implementation efforts.
b) It is no secret that Cumulocity is currently preparing
LWM2M support for its platform. We rely on Leshan as library
for basic LWM2M connectivity. We've noticed that the frequency
of milestone releases has decreased, and I was curious if this
was a sign of an upcoming major release or more of a "relaxed
progress" in the project. So far, we're using 1.0.0-M4, but
for production use we would strongly prefer a formally
released version. In addition, for the further planning of our
developments it would be great to know roughly how Leshan will
evolve over the next time. This will allow us to align our
development with the Leshan roadmap.
Best Regards,
Elias
![]()
_______________________________________________
leshan-dev mailing list
leshan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/leshan-dev
