[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jms-dev] Greetings, I've joined as a new committer
|
From my Azure experience, I can
confidently tell you JMS is very, very far from a legacy
technology. Indeed even our own Azure Service Bus supports JMS and
this support will likely only get better in the future.
Reza Rahman
Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Speaker, Blogger
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual
community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
On 3/17/2020 2:21 PM, Werner Keil
wrote:
Welcome Ondro,
Although some consider JMS a "legacy" technology like EJB
and others and may want it at least optional for Jakarta EE, I
know from some of my largest customers including the current
one, that JMS and Messaging are an important centerpiece of
Enterprise Integration systems.
Some of them also inspired for crazy ideas like a
correlation between IoT systems using MQTT and more
traditional JMS, the brokers are sometimes capable of both
look at ActiveMQ, but especially OpenMQ still is a bit
outdated to some extent. Have not checked Payara "Full"
recently, but assuming it is still close enough to Glassfish,
then there should be some OpenMQ in it, and where you are able
to contribute something back to the spec implementation, that
contribution is more than welcome. After all it'll benefit
your product and customers as well.
Hi Ondrej! Welcome!
Overall this project is still bootstrapping and there's
plenty of room for people to come in and start adding
shape. We're still a blank sheet of paper and you
wouldn't offend anyone if you just started writing some
things down. In fact that's a lot of what we need.
Certainly I have a bunch of crazy ideas on what we could
do, but ideally they are not even half of the crazy ideas
we get.
Feel completely encouraged to propose or do anything.
Hello
all,
I've
recently joined the Messaging specification
project as a new committer. I'm a
representative of Payara who is a member of
the Jakarta EE WG and nominated
me as a committer for Jakarta Messaging and
Jakarta Batch specifications to reinforce the
team and help. I realize that my committer
membership wasn't approved by any vote and
that I have no history in the Java EE Batch
specification either. Therefore I want to
assure you I won't commit anything on my own
until I earn enough credit to do that. I'll
rather act as a contributor first, raising PRs
and asking for approval of any steps I'll be
doing.
To
be honest, I haven't been a member of any Java
EE JCP expert group. But I've been closely
working with the Java EE progress for around 4
years, before and while working at Payara. I'm
a committer on the Eclipse MicroProfile
project since it has joined the Eclipse
foundation in 2017. In MicroProfile I've
worked closely with some other Messaging
committers like David Blevins and Kevin
Sutter. Some other committers know me very
well through my other activities related to
MicroProfile and Jakarta EE.
I
sincerely wish to be a valuable addition to
the team and earn your respect.
Kind
regards,
Ondrej
Mihályi
Senior Payara
Service Engineer
Payara-Tech LDA -
Open Source Enterprise Software
& Support
E: ondrej.mihalyi@xxxxxxxxxxx |
T: +1 415 523 0175 | M:
+421 902 079 891
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payara-Tech LDA,
Registered Office: Rua Nova de São Pedro
no. 54, 2nd floor, room “D”, 9000 048
Funchal, Ilha da Madeira, Portugal
_______________________________________________
jms-dev
mailing list
jms-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To
unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jms-dev
_______________________________________________
jms-dev mailing list
jms-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jms-dev
_______________________________________________
jms-dev mailing list
jms-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jms-dev