On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Greg Wilkins <
gregw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8 October 2012 22:59, Jesse McConnell <
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In summary, I don't like the aggregate idea, it harkens back to
>> concepts of days past and java has moved beyond monolithic jars like
>> this.
>
> All true - but not everybody has yet to see the maven light :)
>
> But it sounds like we have a rough consensus!
>
>
>> But that said, one of them is a lot better then 5 or 6 of them
>> and cuts down on a lot of the over the top duplication. Activated
>> from a release profile breaks the 'build always what you intend to
>> release' concept but I am fine with that for this one artifact.
>
> We can have it turned on in CI so that we don't get release day surprises.
>
> I'll create the one jetty-aggregate module sometime before the next release.
>
> cheers
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-dev mailing list
>
jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev
_______________________________________________
jetty-dev mailing list
jetty-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-dev