Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Concurrency TCK without remote EJB, javax.rmi.RemoteException
So there is a successful run against the web profile here:
https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/10/job/jakarta-concurrency-tck-glassfish-run2/13/

I don't know what went into that.

From the server.log of your run, there are several additional errors like:

Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Invalid application.  EJB CounterSingleton exposes a Remote client view. This feature is not part of the EJB 3.1 Lite API
	at com.sun.ejb.containers.BaseContainer.assertFullProfile(BaseContainer.java:1029)
	at com.sun.ejb.containers.BaseContainer.<init>(BaseContainer.java:557)
	at com.sun.ejb.containers.StatelessSessionContainer.<init>(StatelessSessionContainer.java:111)
	at com.sun.ejb.containers.StatelessSessionContainer.<init>(StatelessSessionContainer.java:105)
	at com.sun.ejb.containers.StatelessContainerFactory.createContainer(StatelessContainerFactory.java:37)
	at org.glassfish.ejb.startup.EjbApplication.loadContainers(EjbApplication.java:198)
	... 66 more
The concurrency tck used can't be the updated version as there is only one CounterSingleton class in the tck, and it is now:
@Stateless
public class CounterSingleton implements Counter {

   private int count = 0;

   public void inc() {
      count++;
   }

   public int getCount() {
      return count;
   }

   public void reset() {
      count = 0;
   }
}

public interface Counter {

   public void inc();

   public int getCount();

   public void reset();
}

On Jun 28, 2022 at 2:56:44 PM, Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 6/28/22 1:51 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:


On 6/28/22 1:42 PM, Scott Stark wrote:
I have create a fork of the concurrency project and update the tck to only use local EJBs and even removed use of javax.rmi.RemoteException:

I have build the current glassfish repo and run the appserver/tests/tck/concurrency project against a build of this version of the concurrency TCK. It is showing no errors when run with SE 17. The PR for this update is here:

I'll fork the Platform TCK CI Concurrency test job to run with https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/glassfish/web-7.0.0-SNAPSHOT-nightly.zip + https://github.com/jakartaee/concurrency/pull/245 and see what that shows.

https://gist.github.com/scottmarlow/404db044a9745095b13050547044318d is copy of a failure from server.log that I see when testing with https://github.com/jakartaee/concurrency/pull/245 and some additional changes I needed for running pushed to https://github.com/scottmarlow/concurrency/tree/marlowhack

CI job link is https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/10/job/jakarta-concurrency-tck-glassfish-run_hacktest/10

Some of the output copied from the server.log:

"

1. A valid ejb jar requires at least one session, entity (1.x/2.x style), or message-driven bean. 
2. EJB3+ entity beans (@Entity) are POJOs and please package them as library jar. 
3. If the jar file contains valid EJBs which are annotated with EJB component level annotations (@Stateless, @Stateful, @MessageDriven, @Singleton), please check server.log to see whether the annotations were processed properly.
	at org.glassfish.ejb.deployment.util.EjbBundleValidator.accept(EjbBundleValidator.java:123)
"

Does ^ mean that Local beans are also not handled by GlassFish 7 Web?  Or something else?

Scott

Scott


I'm not sure how to test this against a web profile configuration of glassfish. Can that be done from the appserver/tests/tck/concurrency project?




_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev

Back to the top