[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Looking for a couple of Wave:0 and Wave:1 volunteers...
|
Hi,Thanks for your
interest! In order to release a new version of a Specification Project,
we need an updated Specification (document), API, TCK, and CI (Compatible
Implementation). All of the projects now have at least a Milestone
API artifact in Maven Central. That's good. But, now we need
to start completing the other required artifacts in order to release an
update Specification Project. For example, Mark Thomas volunteered
to help drive the EL 4.0 release to help demonstrate what all needs to
be done for a Project release. In the same light, Fred Rowe has offered
to help drive Concurrency 2.0 across this same finish line.The specific volunteers
that I am looking for this exercise need to be committers on the Specification
Projects. These volunteers need to be committers due to the Jenkins
builds that will be required for this exercise. But, I'm sure each
of these Projects will need additional volunteers (contributors and committers)
to complete all of the necessary work.So, if you are
interested in helping, I would suggest reaching out to the individual Project
mailing lists for the Projects that are volunteering for this exercise.
For the examples cited thus far, this would be the EL
mailing list and
the Concurrency
mailing list.
I'm hoping to get a couple of additional volunteer Specification
Projects.FYI, part of this
exercise is to also establish a roadmap and process for completing the
rest of the Projects. So, there will be plenty of opportunities to
volunteer your services across all of the Projects (just in case EL and
Concurrency don't flip your trigger). :-) Thanks again!
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutterFrom:
Hamed
Hatami <hamedhatami2012@xxxxxxxxx>To:
jakartaee-platform
developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>Date:
03/14/2020
02:57Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Looking for a couple of Wave:0 and Wave:1
volunteers...Sent
by: jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'm wondering if I can helpOn Sat, 14 Mar 2020, 01:33 Reza Rahman,
<reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:I am extremely sorry if this is a dumb
question. Could you kindly help me understand what the actual work is?
That will help recruit the right people. If need be, we can have a quick
one-on-one call.Reza Rahman
Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Speaker, Blogger
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community
member and do not reflect the views of my employer.On 3/11/2020 6:04 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:As I was looking
at the overall work effort required to deliver Jakarta EE 9 by the end
of June, I see that the Wave:1 deliverables would need to start
their official ballots by March 24.
(Note, all of this is assuming a sequential ordering of our Wave
deliverables, which is not always the case. But, it's the worse case,
so I'm going with it for this exercise.)
Since March 24 is less than two weeks away, I'd like to get some Specification
Project volunteers to work through the process of delivering their materials
for ballot. I figured some of the Wave:0 and Wave:1 Projects would
be the best ones to pick from.
Wave:0 https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-ee4j/projects/17?card_filter_query=label%3Awave%3A0
Wave:1
https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-ee4j/projects/17?card_filter_query=label%3Awave%3A1
Once we start to work through the wrinkles of preparing for this ballot
process, then we can maybe adjust the schedule deadlines to better align
with reality.
For those of you not familiar with this balloting process, here are the
official
requirements.
But, in a nutshell, you would need your final API, TCK, and Compatible
Implementation ready to release to Maven. If your Project is also
planning to provide a Specification update based on the contributed Specification
source, then your final Specification would also be required. There
are a few Specification Projects in Waves 0 and 1 with at least 6 out of
the 11 checkboxes marked. Can we get any volunteers from these Projects
to help push these across the ballot finish line? (Although much
of the actual work can be provided by Contributors, the final push with
the Jenkins builds and Maven releases would need to be done by Committers.)
Another caveat... This request would be for Projects not dependent
on Glassfish as their Compatible Implementation. Glassfish will not
be ready in time for this initial push. I am focusing on Projects
that have independent, standalone Compatible Implementations. Those
Implementations may eventuall feed into the Glassfish deliverable.
But, they can also be used as a standalone Compatible Implementation for
testing and verification purposes.
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev