| Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Transitioning Jakarta EE to the jakarta namespace |
I doubt anyone would bother saying anything if their choices aren't even counted. That is a good way to ensure decisions are really not representative of what Java EE users actually want.
What am I missing? On 5/8/2019 8:28 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Ok, community. We'll top 100 responses to this thread any second now. We need to start curating some of the data so the feedback is captured. I have attempted to kick start something a bit wiki-like that can be updated via PRs: - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/tree/master/namespace Things that need doing: - A full audit of each spec's "other" javax usage (PRs welcome!!) https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/blob/master/namespace/other-javax-references.adoc - A list of each spec jar and its full transitive dependencies: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/blob/master/namespace/transitive-dependencies.adoc - A careful eye to review this informational list of "not affected" namespaces https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/blob/master/namespace/unaffected-packages.adoc - You to clean up and submit your uniquely awesome proposal in this format: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/blob/master/namespace/proposal-01-bigbang.adoc https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/blob/master/namespace/proposal-02-incremental.adoc On proposals, if you image a variant that is more specific or slightly different that the two above, definitely submit it. -David _______________________________________________ jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev