|Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] Ratified Implementations and special designation in the eyes of users|
|I saw that and commented there too. Now we've got two conversations going. It's ok :)|
I see part of the motivation was to document the optional tests people pass. The short version of my suggestion there is we should make that a requirement for the Public Test Results page.
Technically speaking the links we're using in the Compatible Implementations list was always intended to be the Public Test Results. Perhaps the name I gave those in the process document was bad, but the intent was it would serve as more informational download page the vendor could control and brand and be the link we used when we pointed to their certified product.
We should either start using them or perhaps abandon the concept to reduce complexity in our release process.
Back to the top