Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Does the EFSL license need to be in the javadocs dist?

For this release, I think we should accept both (or all three) ways.
For future releases, we can create a common footer/template that all specs can use. 


On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:05 PM Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In reviewing the BV javadocs, the footer statement is correct, but there is no link to an EFSL license file and there is no EFSL license content in the apidocs tree. Is there a requirement to have a link to a local file? Could we just be using a common external link to the page?

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top