Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Java Records and Jakarta EE


> Am 04.12.2021 um 17:46 schrieb Reza Rahman <reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Here is some preliminary analysis and discussion for Persistence: The gist is that I don’t think Persistence needs to do anything right now, but there may be value in looking into a standard utility that can convert to and from Records.

There are a couple of misconceptions in the README of the project, which I've commented on here [0].

JPA requiring default constructors pretty much everywhere *is* a severe limitation to the entity design for dozens of reasons. Records make that pretty obvious. So while of course you can argue Persistence doesn't "need " to do anything regarding this aspect, but I think it should. Because improving on this would broadly benefit Persistence, not only in persisting records.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Back to the top