Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration.

With this proposal, if a server wished to implement both Jakarta EE and MicroProfile, presumably they'd need to support the Config specification in both namespaces (would the namespace change in the Jakarta EE fork?) at potentially different version levels and with different release cadences.

I can understand why Jakarta EE specs may wish to depend on MicroProfile config, but I'm not sure forking it is the right idea. Is there another option? Are there IP issues, or technical issues that constrain you from using MicroProfile Config as it is?


On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:35 PM Otavio Santana <otaviopolianasantana@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everyone, I sent this discussion about the total integration of MicroProfile and Jakarta and I understood that it is not possible.

My question is: Does it make sense if we create a fork of Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration?
The project seems stable and it will valuable to several projects such as JPA, JMS, and NoSQL.
I wrote a draft proposal about it, please, let me know what do you think about it.

Otávio Santana
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Jonathan Gallimore

Back to the top