Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ide-dev] [ui-best-practices-working-group] Working sets (WAS: Re: Java IDEs comparison)

I think the biggest issue with a multi-language perspective is how to do a multi-language “Open Type”. It’s really the only thing I run into when trying to do Java in the C++ perspective or C++ in the Java perspective.

Any thoughts on that? Is this something we can even fix?


From: <ui-best-practices-working-group-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: UX Group <ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 at 7:30 AM
To: UX Group <ui-best-practices-working-group@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ui-best-practices-working-group] [ide-dev] Working sets (WAS: Re: Java IDEs comparison)

On 09/30/2016 01:15 PM, Brian de Alwis wrote:
Not sure what makes a blocker
I was thinking about the context of the IDEs as we ship them (EPP packages).
But this is for sure an important issue. I'll try to look at it one of these days.

Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers
My blog - My Tweets

Back to the top