| I created an aggregate New and Noteworthy based on what I could find
    from the projects involved. I handpicked entries that (a) I could
    (re)articulate and (b) were user focused (though I did throw GEF a
    bone based on their enthusiasm to be included). 
 https://www.eclipse.org/mars/noteworthy/
 
 I dropped the ball getting this linked last week. I hooked it up
    this morning.
 
 I don't see this as cast in stone. We can update this document.
 
 Wayne
 
 
 On 29/06/15 02:07 PM, Denis Roy wrote:
 I
      believe Wayne is addressing this as we type, but the lack of a
      combined New and Noteworthy make the upgrade experience rather
      unexciting.
      
 I upgraded Luna to Mars, and couldn't really tell what was
      different from five minutes ago since I pointed my shiny new
      Eclipse at an existing workspace.  I was left with the question,
      "why did I just upgrade?"
 
 I'll open a FR, but I think we could/should leverage the Welcome
      screen to show some exciting What's New info even if we're working
      on an existing workspace.
 
 I did file some bugs for the horrible look of Eclipse on Linux.
      Apparently my version of GTK 3 and/or oxygen theme has something
      to do with it.
 
 Denis
 
 
 
 On 06/29/2015 04:45 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
 
 Reddit:
        _______________________________________________https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3aybpe/eclipse_mars_now_available/
 * Overall, some interest and enthusiasm. Even people who don't
        like
 Eclipse love to talk about it ;)
 * Dark Theme still not perfect
 * JDT completion not perfect with Java 8 (it was highlighter in
        an
 EclipseCon France talk:
 https://www.eclipsecon.org/france2015/session/jdk-8-refactoring-eclipse
        )
 * Questionable benefit of the Mars .app and installer
 But there are some good arguments in this thread to defend
        Eclipse
 against IntelliJ:
 * The lack of incremental builder in IntelliJ is unacceptable
        for some users
 * Swing-based APIs are uglier than SWT-based ones in much cases.
 As usual, those who say bad things against Eclipse seem to not
        have
 started it since Kepler.
 
 I'm a bit surprised by the lack of feedback on the nested
        projects
 thing. It seems to be too hidden for most users to find it
        (since many
 packages use the Package Explorer view, which doesn't even
        provide the
 feature; and since even if user open the Project Explorer the
        feature is
 off by default). However, everyone who finds this feature seems
        to be
 immediately very pleased with it, that's already good.
 --
 Mickael Istria
 Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
        <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
 My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
 <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 ide-dev mailing list
 ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
        unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev
 
 
 ide-dev mailing list
 ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
      unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev
 
 
 --  
      Wayne Beaton 
      @waynebeaton 
      The Eclipse Foundation
         |