Re: [ide-dev] Survey for IDE feature enhancements

[Sven Efftinge <sven@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, that could be a problem.

OTOH it's what we developers work with every day. So I expect many people to care and that they appreciate a more detailed survey.

We could try to strip the number of compiler checks down by doing a first survey on this list.

On Nov 20, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Fwiw, I would not recommend this approach for a survey. If you get too detailed people start to either 1) not complete the survey or 2) make up their answers.

 

From: ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sven Efftinge
Sent: November-20-13 1:16 PM
To: Discussions about the IDE
Subject: Re: [ide-dev] Survey for IDE feature enhancements

 

Yes, I would do that if we agree we want to go this way.

 

On Nov 20, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Am 20.11.2013 um 12:03 schrieb Sven Efftinge <sven@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

What if we do a dedicated survey only for the compiler checks, where we list the ones currently ignored (I counted 31)

and let the community state what severity they would prefer for which check?

 

I’m not convinced we’ll get enough data from this. Seems pretty specific and takes some time to answer. But who knows. Do you volunteer to create the questions for such a survey? :)

 

-Gunnar

 

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

_______________________________________________
ide-dev mailing list
ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev

 

_______________________________________________
ide-dev mailing list
ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev