On 09/23/2013 09:28 PM, Gunnar
Wagenknecht wrote:
I thought about this as well. This working group could focus
on marketing aspects (such as the /ide and /java pages) as well
as coming up with a sustainable model for funding platform
development.
Marketing is not what most of the contributing companies are looking
for. Almost any company contributing to an IDE-related project do it
either because they are very big users of Eclipse, or because they
ship an IDE based on the Eclipse IDE. Those companies are interested
by improvements that will boost their productivity with Eclipse or
that will increase the quality of their own IDE.
Most companies tempted to join such an IDE working group won't do
that just to boost the Eclipse IDE, but to take direct benefit from
them. Spending money to get Eclipse get 2 more % of market share is
not a direct benefit.
Instead, what I hope such a working group could do is, based on the
knowledge of IDE market companies have, to identify the main area
where Eclipse has to improve and influence (with money or whatever
works) some contributors to focus on those topics.
Of course, if some people in this working group want to do
marketing, nothing should stop them, but if you ask Big Corp, which
edits an IDE on top of Eclipse, to give money to make marketing
around Eclipse IDE and create a web page to grow user rate of 2%,
it's most likely you won't get it.
|