Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [higgins-dev] new IdASRegistry

That's fine with me. I just want to make sure the IdASRegistry can do everything it needs to do... Let me know if you feel anything is missing.

In the meantime, maybe I can commit my XRDS ConfigurationHandler, which should not break anything. Just so I can try my new CVS account and get a feeling for how committing works. Greg, is that ok? Is there anything I need to know before checking in new things?


On 8/6/07, Tom Doman <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As a Context Provider writer, though I've looked at it some and we had a few discussions via higgins-dev about it, I haven't had a chance to thoroughly review and give you feedback on the new IdASRegistry.  At the moment, I'm working on a different Bandit task that will probably take up the next 3 days after which I'll be on vacation and will not return until Monday, August 13th.  Unless no one minds most of the CPs being broken until then (or longer depending on how long it takes me to digest what you've done and fix things up), or someone else wants to make the changes, I'd suggest we hold off for a while.  I intend to get to the new IdASRegistry review as soon as my current task is completed.


>>> "Markus Sabadello" <msabadello@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 8/6/2007 7:49 AM >>>
Hi all,

Since I didn't get much feedback about the new XRI/XRDS based IdASRegistry,
I am wondering if you guys (especially Jim and people working on Context
Providers) had a chance to look at it.

I would like to check it in soon so we can get this running, and it will
definitely break a few things. The changes will include replacing
ContextRefs with ContextIds in the IContextFactory interface.

The relevant Wiki pages are:

If noone objects I propose to commit this in a few days.. Let me know if I
can help with anything.


higgins-dev mailing list

Back to the top