Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [higgins-dev] : FW: [CQ 1369] Jaxen Version: 1.1


-----Original Message-----
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Doman
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 6:30 PM
To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] : FW: [CQ 1369] Jaxen Version: 1.1


Now that we've switched over to the Higgins configuration code, it
appears that our Jaxen dependency is now gone.  Currently, I only use
DOM4j to stream out our OWL ontology for the JNDI CP and that test runs
fine without Jaxen around.


>>> "Mary Ruddy" <mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 7/25/2007 6:38 AM >>>

Our request to use Jaxen 1.1 has been rejected by Eclipse Legal.  See

Alternatives include: 

 1) Finding someone at this project and getting them to respond to
Legal's requests. 
 2) Using something else  (not using dom4j)
 3) Other suggestions... 

-----Original Message-----
From: emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:57 PM
To: mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [CQ 1369] Jaxen Version: 1.1 

Janet Campbell <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
              State|under_review                |rejected
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
           Keywords|                            |pnc
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Janet Campbell <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
12:55:44 --- We have completed our review of this package and there are
issues that are currently impeding our approval of this code:  (1) We
to confirm that the mechanism by which developers agreed to submit their
code under a BSD style license; and (2) the code includes an article
copyrighted to the Associated Press (/code/xml/nitf.xml) with a notation
that appears to prohibit the re-distribution of the article.  

We have approached the developers and have not been able to get clarity
these two points.  Removing the article would solve one out of those two
problems but not both.  As a result, we cannot approve this submission
this point in time.  I will now close this bug.  If new information is
provided on these issues, we will re-open the bug.

Configure bugmail: 
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the CQ.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the CQ.

higgins-dev mailing list

Back to the top