RE: [geclipse-dev] need help to use a glite WMS

["SCHAER Frederic" <frederic.schaer@xxxxxx>]

Hi Ariel,

Well, 3.0 roughly means "built for GT2 and SL3", and 3.1 theoritically
means "built for GT4 and SL4". The WMS/LB that's in production for now
is a horrible hybrid, which uses some parts of 3.1 code, but runs with
GT2 and on SL3... so I'd say I'm using a bit of both versions here ;) ,
but more importantly, I'm using production version.

What do you mean by "well known issues for accessing it via Webservices"
? I suspect the WMS/LB I have is capable of turning around those issues,
but since I don't know what these are and how I can check they are
present, I don't know where to search for a fix in the configuration -
because I think it's just a configuration problem...

I'll wait for Pawel's advice... thanks !

Frederic

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ariel Garcia [mailto:garcia@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:25 PM
>To: Developer mailing list
>Cc: SCHAER Frederic
>Subject: Re: [geclipse-dev] need help to use a glite WMS
>
>Hi Frederic,
>
>> I have setup a gLite WMS, and tried to submit a job to it using
>> gEclipse.
>>
>> This job is effectively submitted, and WMS seems to be happy with it,
>> but I can't get the job status using gEclipse : I always get a status
>> wich is "UNKNOWN" and reason is "Bug in gLite 3.0 LB".
>>
>> Thing is that this is a gLite 3.0 WMSLB, using gLite 3.1 code.
>
>well, what does that exactly mean, is it 3.0 or 3.1?  ;-)
>Somehow the L&B part has to be 3.0 code which has the well known issues
for
>accessing it via Webservices.
>
>> I previously had it setup another way (using the so called "yaim")
and
>> gEclipse was able to retrieve the job status with even older RPMs...
>> which makes me think this is more a configuration problem than a bug
in
>> the LB.
>...
>> Is there a way to know what's me from getting the status (so that I
can
>> try to tweak the WMS configuration in order to have this working) ?
>
>then perhaps Pawel (our devel/expert there) can help further, but my
guess
>would be that the version you are trying to use is old(er) than
required.
>
>Cheers, Ariel