[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [equinox-dev] State of Gerrit jobs
- From: Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:16:00 +0000
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
On 17 Mar 2014, at 21:32, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2014-03-16 17:06:33 +0000, Mickael Istria said:
>> I don't think it's that much a matter of resource, it's more that you're the first one to report this issue. Did you open a bug for it?
> So there were only two earlier builds:
> - one in February
> - one in December
> Both were failing as well. I think that by itself is pretty good evidence that the team does not use Gerrit. Why should it be thrown in the face of poor contributors then? That's like being more holier than the pope.
> BTM, the issue has something to do with the complicated platform build. People knowing that will also understand that's a time sink. I bet it never worked or only worked by accident when the Gerrit trigger was set up. Anyway, the build issue - as I've been told - is not new. Thus I didn't report it as a new bug.
One of those was mine, and I was concerned that it hadn’t been applied, which is why I asked if it was successful.
It turns out that the change was manually cherry picked into the Equinox codebase, even though the build in Gerrit was marked as failed and the bug is still showing as open in my bundles review:
So yes, it’s clear that the Equinox project doesn’t use Gerrit.