Re: [elk-dev] New repository?

[Christoph Daniel Schulze <cds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everyone,

I will go ahead and ask the Eclipse administrators to create elk-models
for us.

Cheers,
 Chris

On 21/06/17 23:32, Miro Spönemann wrote:
> I think dashes are more common as delimiters in repository names, so I'm for elk-js / elk-models.
> 
> If the models are mainly used as test data, I would prefer to keep them together with the code for which they are tested. If you have more uses in mind for those models, a separate repo might be better. For the js part another repo is fine for me.
> 
> Miro
> 
>> Am 21.06.2017 um 12:56 schrieb Nis Wechselberg <nbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Am 21.06.2017 um 12:41 schrieb Christoph Daniel Schulze:
>>> Regarding additional repositories, I don't think that we have already
>>> decided on where to put the JavaScript version of the library (branch or
>>> additional repository). If we decide on the latter, we will need another
>>> repository, which would probably be called elkjs? elk.js? elk-js?
>>
>> If the JavaScript version ends up in the eclipse/elk namespace I would
>> root for eclipse/elk.js as the repository name.
>> For consistency I would also root for the name elk.models for our data
>> repository.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature