Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] [External] : New project proposal Eclipse Documentation for Jakarta EE
  • From: Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 08:30:28 -0700
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; 1; spf=pass; dmarc=pass action=none; dkim=pass; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=E4h5nOGztYwnF7M2jW5HMrMRX0cNKhRDD7PYyerYxDU=; b=day78Pw4L72FQdzDfz9W+Ku9/T2cS5i2S0LntC9fh2GCSdlJqyNRmHjBu2NOktP0P+kAlo56e/B3ve9z9a1N7Mi6wufrq9tYpdrsFuRWwktaRIyRXvghyFssCDjE9E+m0MokXBvsrLMQuJkGFR2p0Of+S+y/1qUcxV7hVCH6tlLZBRJd+0QpUa95+lOI7RV6RA9TNWPo8N6ta6CEct9wa2oLoasY4CXUDQ+U10Lx/LrMxzuVGbMlNGj+RdqI39q90BTGJ8sPg7eL15j6V8fXgY3yJ8xhoo2cCP2SAazDusxiM3nEQ6pWbZUq/Qwm9sanYbEB7dG02xT3r7TIcJngtA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901;; cv=none; b=XJ2IBGv66U47usf+0zUR7EDp8PzrbwhQD4eNftvZpMlUacV/EPsGJhM4U81J+SRs/N0NqDWz7vkf4F519aca6F+QJySxFdOPJj7astHHrNEilthtq/Eh5WcVAoApdHiNuaE+aaaIQER11oxep8yT9qfQkuMjBNZVYLrMuH4RiNrZAKCDlkRiEKqUUfAnpmYjuZq7yiWNHANcE8ega3snha0bZ+3T54Un2LvmXWzGv/GyRYLuelg8ypqOVOdTw9GNJ2dsTc5KQfVnWEXZ3DLoprVhGEy4IFjollKaSgveT6CkdXlITxaKXWjtcNv17FbD1i6jzJEKn0cI6cVfb/A05w==
  • Delivered-to: ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • List-archive: <>
  • List-help: <>
  • List-subscribe: <>, <>
  • List-unsubscribe: <>, <>
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0

I would recommend we ballot the scope change just to make it clear this material is leaving the context of the specification project. I believe, since the scope statements are rather vague across the board, it would be better to formally ballot this change.

I would prefer that license not change, I believe it is EDL for everything (BSD 3-clause).

-- Ed

On 5/3/2023 10:17 PM, Ivar Grimstad via ee4j-pmc wrote:

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:32 AM Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I submitted a couple of comments:

Oracle would prefer we stick with existing license (EDL I believe).

I am okay with that.  

I believe the Platform project, which currently holds this content, will need a restructuring ballot to change the scope and formalize that this material is removed from the scope of the Platform Spec project.

Yes, a restructuring review by the EMO. No ballots are involved. 
Since the current scope statement doesn't say anything about the tutorial, first cup, or examples, this should just be a formality to tick some checkbox somewhere.

-- Ed

On 5/3/2023 11:21 AM, Eclipse Management Office EMO via ee4j-pmc wrote:
Dear PMC,
please respond to this message with a +1 if you're prepared to take on responsibility for overseeing the governance of this/these new project(s)
Proposal link:

Ticket link:

Project Description: The Eclipse Documentation for Jakarta EE project provides documentation and related examples for the Jakarta EE platform and its components. It is a guide to developing enterprise applications for the Jakarta EE Platform, using Eclipse GlassFish Server and other popular runtimes.
Thanks in advance!
Maria Teresa Delgado

The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation

ee4j-pmc mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!J2v5r4p2PbuD4D4EwH3tH5nn9PIoaIVgg8fAAUwoYcBZo5s40wXBaz7L1Iv_xM75xSHBXlXDZyM2NF3HYA$ 
ee4j-pmc mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit


Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

ee4j-pmc mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!MeEKefAEIv7ONONrdRTQh3PRHHXC9J_AFjXC2lvlhISo823cT_mTFMl3TPDB___WB4jcegbgfst56sjdUA$ 

Back to the top