Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] Checklist for release reviews
Mentors have no formal role in the release process.

They are a resource that's available to the project while it is in incubation; their primary role is to answer questions about the EDP and otherwise help the project through the Incubation Phase to graduation.

Wayne

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:39 PM Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Wayne,

Do the people listed as Mentors on each project have any role to play in any of this?

-- Ed


On 11/8/2018 1:34 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
The EMO accepts a single +1 from any PMC member as approval. So, yes. Please do share the load.

If the PMC wishes to have a different arrangement, let me know and we'll sort something out.

Wayne

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:21 PM Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, I don't think we all have to perform every review that comes through the PMC...  Maybe we want to for these first ones just to get familiar with the overall effort.  But, my experience with MicroProfile is that we just need one +1 from a PMC member.  Once we get the one positive vote, then we're feeling pretty good from a PMC viewpoint.  I suppose someone could come along and do a -1 before the actual Review, but I wonder how common that is once someone has given a +1?

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Java EE architect
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        EE4J PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        11/08/2018 09:40 AM
Subject:        Re: [ee4j-pmc] Checklist for release reviews
Sent by:        ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



We have a checklist in the handbook. You'll note that this checklist is pretty generic. The EMO uses this (roughly) as part of our review. It would be helpful if the PMC could alert the EMO if they know that the project is falling short on any particular item, but we don't certainly expect the PMC to go through every line of this checklist.

Where we need the PMC's help is in confirming that project- and TLP-specific things are being observed, e.g., validation that the project is operating within the charter of the Top Level Project, and within the bounds of its own scope. In most cases, you should be able to determine whether or not this is true by just reading the description of the release. i.e. it shouldn't take more than a couple of minutes.

I do need a little extra help from the PMC to ensure that project releases do not violate the current and any future trademark agreement that we have with Oracle. Note that it is generally the case that Eclipse projects cannot violate trademarks owned by other organizations; getting some help from the PMC to do this would be great, but I understand that it can be time consuming (I don't expect the PMC to go line-by-line through code). I'm thinking that we'll make this a required checkbox in the release record and require that the Project Lead attest that the project code and documentation does not violate trademarks owned by others (or something like that). In the meantime, maybe it's enough to let this paragraph serve as a reminder for project leads that this is an issue.

The request for approval is also a good opportunity for the PMC to make comments and recommendations regarding growing the diversity of project committers or other health metrics, conformance to best practices, technical direction, etc.

Wayne

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:34 AM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Now all the release reviews are coming. Do we have a simple checklist for what we need to check before voting?

 

I know it was discussed just checking whether we have something before I review the EDP.

 

Thanks

 

Steve Millidge

Founder
Payara Services Limited
Payara Micro – Small, Simple, Serious
W: www.payara.fish| T: +44 207 754 0481 ; +1 415 523 0175 | M: +44 7920 100 626 | Twitter: @Payara_Fish

Registered in England and Wales: 09998946,

Registered Office: Malvern Hills Science Park, Geraldine Road, Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 3SZ

 

 
_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc


--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Meet us at EclipseCon Europe 2018: LUDWIGSBURG, OCTOBER 23 - 25_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc


_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc



--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Meet us at EclipseCon Europe 2018: LUDWIGSBURG, OCTOBER 23 - 25


_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc



--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Meet us at EclipseCon Europe 2018: LUDWIGSBURG, OCTOBER 23 - 25

Back to the top