[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ee4j-community] Jakarta EE logo selection process - next steps
|
+1. That's my only concern too.
I thank Eclipse though for giving us an explanation for the rejected logos (as opposed to the name selection where we just got the two final names and no explanations).
Thank you, Eclipse, for informing us about the planned process.
Everything makes sense but one thing. In the context of recent criticism and recent
Mike's blog post, the following sentence makes me worried:
"From this process, the list of candidate logos will be trimmed to 2-4 final candidate logos. We are targeting completing this process by mid-next week."
It sounds like there will be an arbitrary decision to evaluate all remaining logs that pass all validations and somebody will choose 2-4 logos they like most. I think all logos that pass validations should be offered to the community in a public poll, not just 2-4 of them. I see that there are already 7 logos marked as viable alternatives on this page:
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Jakarta_Logo_SubmissionHaving a poll from 2-4 logos makes sense only if either
- no other logos pass the legal and design criteria
- the community already voted from a longer list of logos and the poll is going to a second round to choose the final one from the 2-4 most popular ones
Any other reason would put the community in doubts.
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community