Nope, sorry. :-)
Guillermo González de Agüero wrote on 12/6/17 11:01 AM:
That's
why I preferred to ask ;)
Could you share any insight of the options being considered?
I
didn't say that. :-) Several options are being
discussed, we've made no decision yet.
Guillermo González de Agüero wrote on 12/ 6/17 09:43 AM:
You mean you are considering open
sourcing them as opossed to the idea exposed to the JCP
EC of new specs just referencing the old documents?
That'd be a great step forward.
We've
converted many of our FrameMaker documents
to asciidoc using pandoc. But the issue
with the spec documents is a legal issue,
not a technical issue.
arjan tijms wrote on 12/6/17 6:28 AM:
Hi,
Regarding the spec document
sources, a technical obstacle may be
that many of the older ones are
authored using FrameMaker. This is a
format that isn't particularly suited
for community/oss contributions.
Rewriting it to say AsciiDoc may be a
non-trivial task.
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
|