I didn't say that. :-) Several
options are being discussed, we've made no decision yet.
Guillermo González de Agüero wrote on 12/ 6/17 09:43 AM:
You
mean you are considering open sourcing them as opossed to the idea
exposed to the JCP EC of new specs just referencing the old
documents?
That'd be a great step forward.
We've
converted many of our FrameMaker documents to
asciidoc using pandoc. But the issue with the spec
documents is a legal issue, not a technical issue.
arjan tijms wrote on 12/6/17 6:28 AM:
Hi,
Regarding the spec document sources, a
technical obstacle may be that many of the older
ones are authored using FrameMaker. This is a
format that isn't particularly suited for
community/oss contributions. Rewriting it to say
AsciiDoc may be a non-trivial task.
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
|