[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-community] Initial Committer Lists & Project Meritocracy

Daniel, All,

Yes indeed, the "contributor" is closest to the same role in JCP projects after JCP.next introduced Associate members.Â

I've been full Eclipse committer member for a long time, which is why I both initial committer (to EE4J projects or JNoSQL) and contributor (e.g. to some features of MicroProfile) works in my case. What I meant, is most potential committers to EE4J projects do not seem to have an Eclipse account at all, so whether they participate as committers or contributors they need to get that first. And then process the necessary paperwork. Thanks Wayne for the clarification.

WernerÂ



On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:34 PM, <ee4j-community-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Send ee4j-community mailing list submissions to
    ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    ee4j-community-owner@eclipse.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ee4j-community digest..."


Today's Topics:

 Â1. Re: Initial Committer Lists & Project Meritocracy (Wayne Beaton)
 Â2. Re: Initial Committer Lists & Project Meritocracy
   (Daniel Dias Dos Santos)
 Â3. Re: Initial Committer Lists & Project Meritocracy
   (Alexander Salvanos)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:58:51 -0500
From: Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@eclipse-foundation.org>
To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Initial Committer Lists & Project
    Meritocracy
Message-ID:
    <CALXWXwfwMqPLCXryxMyFcKavqdZPONGS7+iYxtmWyRzbKxb=3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

That's not how it works, Werner. It is entirely possible to be a committer
on an Eclipse Project without having ever signed the ECA.

To *contribute* to an Eclipse project as a non-committer, one must
electronically sign the ECA
<https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#resources-eca>.

To become a *committer* on an Eclipse Project, one must complete an
entirely different bit of committer paperwork
<https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#paperwork>. The committer
paperwork process will be initiated when the creation reviews are complete
and we start the project provisioning process.

Wayne

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Most of them have not signed the ECA, so they won't show as committers
> once the project is approved.
>
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects
The Eclipse Foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community/attachments/20171204/82eae3ff/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:16:10 -0200
From: Daniel Dias Dos Santos <daniel.dias.analistati@gmail.com>
To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Initial Committer Lists & Project
    Meritocracy
Message-ID:
    <CAOuqdjOCW1CTrXhL4ePCRFPVno0iO+mRoWom+Ly8y0giAsJjEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Wayne,

interesting this process, is similar to the process of JCP to be Full or
associated member.

--

*Daniel Dias dos Santos*
Java Developer
Diretor SouJava & JCP Member
GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos
Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/danieldiassantos
Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava

2017-12-04 11:58 GMT-02:00 Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@eclipse-foundation.org
>:

> That's not how it works, Werner. It is entirely possible to be a committer
> on an Eclipse Project without having ever signed the ECA.
>
> To *contribute* to an Eclipse project as a non-committer, one must
> electronically sign the ECA
> <https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#resources-eca>.
>
> To become a *committer* on an Eclipse Project, one must complete an
> entirely different bit of committer paperwork
> <https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#paperwork>. The committer
> paperwork process will be initiated when the creation reviews are complete
> and we start the project provisioning process.
>
> Wayne
>
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Most of them have not signed the ECA, so they won't show as committers
>> once the project is approved.
>>
> --
> Wayne Beaton
> Director of Open Source Projects
> The Eclipse Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> ee4j-community mailing list
> ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community/attachments/20171204/53d33536/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:34:57 +0100
From: "Alexander Salvanos" <salvanos@xxxxxx>
To: ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ee4j-community] Initial Committer Lists & Project
    Meritocracy
Message-ID:
    <trinity-ce98600e-bd5f-4d24-b4bb-eedd31ee66f1-1512405296956@3c-app-gmx-bs05>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community/attachments/20171204/cc9d03d4/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community


End of ee4j-community Digest, Vol 4, Issue 44
*********************************************