| Re: [eclipselink-users] toplink-essentials-agent.jar for Eclipselink |
No, the agent jar was never self contained, so as you mention, there is no point having the extra jar. cowwoc wrote: > > The problem is not as simple as I had first thought ;) > > toplink-essentials-agent.jar is fine except for the fact that its manifest > file contains "Class-Path: toplink-essentials.jar". Obviously I would need > to modify this manifest file to refer to the obfuscated JAR file instead, > so maybe having a separate file isn't of much help to me after all... > > This makes me wonder why Toplink had a separate file to begin with...? I > was under the impression it was a self-contained JAR file. > > Gili > > > cowwoc wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm wondering why EclipseLink doesn't distribute the instrumentation >> agent in a (minimalistic) separate JAR file like TopLink does with >> toplink-essentials-agent.jar >> >> I am processing my application using Proguard and EclipseLink's >> monolithic JAR makes it difficult to process. I'd like Proguard to >> produce one JAR file for my application and one JAR file per agent (since >> you can't deploy more than one agent per JAR file). Obviously I'd prefer >> it if EclipseLink's distribution included this separate JAR file already. >> I look forward to your response. >> >> Thank you, >> Gili >> > > ----- --- http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/ EclipseLink , http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/ TopLink Wiki: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink , http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink Forums: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink , http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink Book: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/toplink-essentials-agent.jar-for-Eclipselink-tp19283298p19288991.html Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.