Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-dev] [External] : Re: EclipseLink 2.7.9 (Final) release

Hi Arjan,

	I hope, that next week we will release 3.0.2 final. Lukas is out of office this week.
	I think, that on the beginning after merge (still not approved)
	and maybe
	we will release 3.0.2-RC2
	and at the end 3.0.2 Final

Thank You

On 7/4/21 11:39 PM, arjan tijms wrote:

Just wondering, it seems the 3.x release is still at 3.0.2-RC1. What are the plans for 3.0.2 final?

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:53 PM William Dazey <dazeydev.3@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:dazeydev.3@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:46 AM Radek Felcman <radek.felcman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:radek.felcman@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
     > But as understand Your question leads into org.eclipse.persistence.asm*.jar naming .
     > I see there two options:
     > 1. Keep there naming without qualifier "org.eclipse.persistence.asm.jar" because it is used/consumed as a 3rd party dependency from 2.7.9?
     > 2. Change file name into previous format e.g. "org.eclipse.persistence.asm_9.0.0.v202010211629.jar" ?

    I would prefer any bundle to have a qualifier on the end that is
    consistent with the other similar bundles. If there is a good reason
    for ASM NOT to have a qualifier, then I am going to ask why does ANTRL
    get a qualifier? Both are thirdparty dependencies, yes? I prefer we
    default to consistency rather than exception, unless there is a good
    reason for a change.



    It is a convenience to have a qualifier on the end of the bundle, but
    I just want to make sure this difference is seen and investigated. I
    vote for adding a qualifier.

     > About 3.0.2 release:
     > Did You find some time to check:
     > Lukas PR
     > and My PR
     > We'd like to know Your opinion about this (which modification You prefer).

    I won't lie, I'm not a maven expert and I don't know which changes are
    appropriate. Are these competing PRs meant to fix a specific issue I
    mentioned? Reading the descriptions for both, I am not sure what the
    purpose of the changes are or what I can review to verify the changes
    look correct. I would appreciate a layman explanation with a before vs
    after comparison if possible. Sorry.

    Will Dazey
    eclipselink-dev mailing list
    eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    To unsubscribe from this list, visit

eclipselink-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!fd74gjMrFkaTfC87ZiY4oMKjPZHj9OpZhWqDsMn7lA6Bkbth-D5QxWD1SFXoZfWiAb0$

Back to the top