| On 27.03.15 21:53, Lukas Jungmann wrote: 
 
      
      just learning from my (bad) experiences :-) say you create a
      clone, do changes, commit them and during the push you hit the
      wall because of something. Not an issue for simple changes but
      anyway - refreshing repo, setting it up properly, redoing changes
      - that can become expensive if one is working on something bigger,
      changing more files etc.Another point - say checkstyle will be in place, which can be
      tricky to set up on the repo side, so no reject but failed build
      (if we will enforce it, and
 
      weekend coming. How long will it take to someone to fix it and do
      just some reformatting change?I guess I understood you incorrectly - you are not suggesting to
    replace serverside checks with client side ones, but to have them in
    addition, right?
 
 Well if someone submits a change which is failing the build that is
    hard to accept as it does mean he did not run the build himself
    before the push.
 Such is also hard to prevent unless we adopt Gerrit reviews, which
    can quickly do these types of verifications on a submitted patch and
    give +1(s) for checkstyle, compilation, licences, whitespace, tests
    (harder - resource heavy) (https://wiki.eclipse.org/Gerrit), which
    is another way to deal with all of these.
 
 MartiNG
 
 
 |