Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] November 12 minutes, actions, and next steps

+1. We need to keep an eye out for potential conflicts but it shouldn't be the rule.

From: Lars Vogel
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 2012 8:58:27 AM EDT
To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Reply To: Eclipsecon NA program committee discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] November 12 minutes, actions, and next steps

Sounds good to me, to many restrictions and rules are silly IMHO.

2012/11/21 Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I think we agreed everyone would not vote for their own submissions.  However, I do think it is important PC members vote for all other submissions. The expectation is that when you are voting you are trying to put together the best program for EclipseCon.  You are not voting to try to make sure your colleagues or team members get a speaking spot.  I trust everyone will vote regardless of their corporate, team or project affiliations.

 

OK?

 

 

From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cédric Brun
Sent: November-21-12 8:40 AM
To: eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] November 12 minutes, actions, and next steps

 

Hi,

we are involved ourselves (or our companies) in many Eclipse projects, shouldn't we have an agreement not voting on submissions coming from our team / colleagues ?

What do you think ?

Cédric


Le 13/11/2012 17:37, John Arthorne a écrit :

Below are minutes from our PC call yesterday:

https://www.eclipsecon.org/wiki/2013_Program_Committee/Call_Minutes#November_12

Everyone PLEASE READ these minutes. Even if you attended the call, please read it. There is important information in there about the selection process and timing. Our next call will be on November 26th, at which point our first round of voting should be done. But of course you already knew that, because you read the minutes from the call, right?

John



_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

 


_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee



_______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee

Back to the top