| RE: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable from Last Meeting |
Here's what I have so far from Intel... Thanks Anurag -----Original Message----- From: eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 5:38 AM To: 'eclipse.org-requirements-council' Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable from Last Meeting Philip thanks.... I also have Paul Clenahan's input from Actuate. Who else is forthcoming? Mike Milinkovich Executive Director, Eclipse Foundation, Inc. Office: 613-224-9461 x228 Cell: 613-220-3223 mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx blog: http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Ma, Philip > Sent: October 3, 2005 8:17 PM > To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; eclipse.org-requirements-council > Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable > from Last Meeting > > Hi Mike, > Sorry for the delay. > > I have the following Bug ID's associated with the HP requirements: > > 1) Use LSB Packaging. Bug #108610 > 2) Open Source JDK. Bug #108614 > 3) JMX support. Bug #109682 > 4) CDT Performance. Bug #88546. Note: we are currently > working this issue with the CDT team. > > I may have one more forthcoming on roadmap visibility. will > send it along if it remains a priority for us. > > Let me know if any questions. > > Thanks. > > Philip Ma > > > ________________________________ > > From: eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on > behalf of Mike Milinkovich > Sent: Mon 9/26/2005 7:09 AM > To: 'eclipse.org-requirements-council' > Subject: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable from > Last Meeting > > > > All, > > > > First the good news. Last week we held the Members Meeting > and had a great deal of valuable input from the Add-in > Providers. I expect to have the tabulated and prioritized > inputs from that meeting sorted out by early next week. > > > > At our last meeting in Boston we agreed that each RC member > will assign bug #'s to each line item in their RC input. The > goal originally was to be provided to the PC by end of > September for input to 3.2. (The line items from the various > members are included in the attached.) > > > > We had agreed that if each RC member sent me their line items > mapped to bug reports that I would take a stab at organizing > them under the themes and priorities. Unfortunately, to date > I have not received any inputs. I do need those in order to > make any progress. > > > > At this point, I would like to postpone our call on Tuesday, > Oct 4th, as even if everyone's inputs arrived this week I > don't have the time left available to create the prioritized > list I was hoping to. > > > > > > > Mike Milinkovich > Executive Director, > Eclipse Foundation, Inc. > Office: 613-224-9461 x228 > Cell: 613-220-3223 > mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > blog: http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ eclipse.org-requirements-council mailing list eclipse.org-requirements-council@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-requirements-counci l
Attachment:
Intel_input_RC_05.doc
Description: Intel_input_RC_05.doc