RE: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable from Last Meeting

["Klaus, Martin" <martin.klaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Mike,

Here are our requirements. Sorry for the delay.

Martin. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 5:38 AM
> To: 'eclipse.org-requirements-council'
> Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable 
> from Last Meeting
> 
> 
> Philip thanks....
> 
> I also have Paul Clenahan's input from Actuate. 
> 
> Who else is forthcoming?
> 
> Mike Milinkovich
> Executive Director,
> Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
> Office: 613-224-9461 x228
> Cell: 613-220-3223
> mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  
> blog: http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Ma, Philip
> > Sent: October 3, 2005 8:17 PM
> > To: mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx; eclipse.org-requirements-council
> > Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable 
> from Last 
> > Meeting
> > 
> > Hi Mike,
> > Sorry for the delay.
> >  
> > I have the following Bug ID's associated with the HP requirements:
> >  
> > 1) Use LSB Packaging.  Bug #108610
> > 2) Open Source JDK.  Bug #108614
> > 3) JMX support.  Bug #109682
> > 4) CDT Performance. Bug #88546.  Note: we are currently 
> working this 
> > issue with the CDT team.
> >  
> > I may have one more forthcoming on roadmap visibility.  
> will send it 
> > along if it remains a priority for us.
> >  
> > Let me know if any questions.  
> >  
> > Thanks.
> >  
> > Philip Ma
> >  
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: eclipse.org-requirements-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> on behalf 
> > of Mike Milinkovich
> > Sent: Mon 9/26/2005 7:09 AM
> > To: 'eclipse.org-requirements-council'
> > Subject: [eclipse.org-requirements-council] Deliverable from Last 
> > Meeting
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > All,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > First the good news. Last week we held the Members Meeting 
> and had a 
> > great deal of valuable input from the Add-in Providers. I expect to 
> > have the tabulated and prioritized inputs from that meeting 
> sorted out 
> > by early next week.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > At our last meeting in Boston we agreed that each RC member will 
> > assign bug #'s to each line item in their RC input. The goal 
> > originally was to be provided to the PC by end of September 
> for input 
> > to 3.2. (The line items from the various members are 
> included in the 
> > attached.)
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > We had agreed that if each RC member sent me their line 
> items mapped 
> > to bug reports that I would take a stab at organizing them 
> under the 
> > themes and priorities. Unfortunately, to date I have not 
> received any 
> > inputs. I do need those in order to make any progress.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > At this point, I would like to postpone our call on 
> Tuesday, Oct 4th, 
> > as even if everyone's inputs arrived this week I don't have 
> the time 
> > left available to create the prioritized list I was hoping to.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Mike Milinkovich
> > Executive Director,
> > Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
> > Office: 613-224-9461 x228
> > Cell: 613-220-3223
> > mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > blog: http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/
> > 
> >  
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-requirements-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-requirements-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-requireme
> nts-council
>

Attachment: Wind River Requirements v2.doc
Description: Wind River Requirements v2.doc