> Ah, that makes
sense. On the other hand, I think most of this movement was implicit in
the decision to go to 4 releases a year, right?
Yes, at least for the planning council
and those involved. I think we need to start to communicate this more aggressively.
I'm not sure everyone is aware of this yet.
Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date:
05.07.2016 15:51 Subject:
Planning the release dates for Oxygen.0 and Neon.X update releases Sent by:
On 2016-07-05 09:37 AM, Daniel Megert wrote: > I am
not sure I understand the comment that the release would need to be "much
Compared to what people/companies were used to with our SR2 dates.
Ah, that makes sense. On the other hand, I think most of this movement
was implicit in the decision to go to 4 releases a year, right?
Just to be clear, I'm also in favor
of having Java 9 in Neon.3 :-)
Excellent :) Let's just hope that Java 9 sticks to its current schedule.