[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results

I agree with Doug, Mira would be nicer but +1 for Mars.

Cheers
Ian


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:25 AM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 mars

(Thanks Chris and Janet)




From:        Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
To:        Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:        02/12/2014 10:04 AM
Subject:        Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results
Sent by:        eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




+1 Love Mira, and Mars is a bit dull, but I’m not sure we have a lot of choice.

Doug.

From: <Mos>, Adrian <adrian.mos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list <
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 8:17 AM
To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list <
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results


+1 for this, seems reasonable.
 
From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent:
12 February 2014 14:01
To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list
Subject:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results

 
I would be OK with Dani's approach too if there is worry about Mira being a problem, both are fine names in my book.
 
We can go with Mars first and then Mira. Is everyone OK with this (a +1 would be nice).
 
If there are no strong objections in 24 hours I will let the EMO know and we will move forward.
 
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Daniel Megert <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eclipse MiRa is an existing product [1]. On the other hand, when I search for Eclipse Mars, most results are indeed connected to the astronomic event. Hence I prefer Mars.

Dani


[1]
http://www.connessioni.biz/website/categoria-prodotti/categoria-video/eclipse-mira-di-locatel.html?lang=en



From:        
Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        12.02.2014 00:39
Subject:        Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results
Sent by:        eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





I think we should just pick amongst ourselves in the interest of getting this done (given that we already had community input for the initial vote). Also the community puts trust in us to handle these types of decisions.

I feel like we should put forth Mira (highest voted of the two) and Mars as a backup again. I actually like both names too.

Anyone have particular feelings about this?


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Doug Schaefer <
dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Although if you search for Eclipse Mira, you’ll see there are others.


From:
Ian Bull <
irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list <
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 6:34 PM

To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list <
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results


That's fine by me. I'm fine with either Mira or Mars (with a slight preference to Mira as it might be more searchable).


Should we consider other names too?


Cheers,

Ian



On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Doug Schaefer <
dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Or should we just pick amongst the council and get this done.


From:
Ian Bull <
irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list <
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 5:54 PM
To:
Eclipse Planning Council private list <
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results


Bummer.... I thought Mercury was a good name too.


Mars and Mira were next on the list. Should we start with a run-off election with those two, or should we start the entire poll over again? Chris, what are your thoughts?


Cheers,

Ian



On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Janet Campbell <
janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Unfortunately, we will not be able to proceed with Mercury.   We’ll need to re-start the process to select a new name.

 

Regards,

Janet

 

---------------------

Janet Campbell

Director, Intellectual Property

Secretary and Legal Counsel

Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

 

 

 

 

From: Mike Milinkovich [mailto:mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:
February-04-14 1:37 PM


To:
Chris Aniszczyk; Eclipse Planning Council private list; Janet Campbell


Subject:
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Luna+1 Poll Results

 
On 04/02/2014 1:21 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
Any updates on this Mike as the Planning Council meets tomorrow!


The only update I can give at the moment is that Magellan is a definite no, and Mercury is probably a yes. We're waiting on one last check before we give the green light. Sorry we're not finalized, but it's not in our hands at the moment.

I suggest that the best the Planning Council can do at the moment is agree that as soon as the trademark review is passed by the EMO, that the approval for "Eclipse Mercury" is done.

--
Mike Milinkovich

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list

eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria |
+1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list

eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria |
+1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list

eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



--
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk

http://aniszczyk.org

+1 512 961 6719 _______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list

eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list

eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.


 
--
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk

http://aniszczyk.org

+1 512 961 6719
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.


_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource