Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Luna+1 Poll Results

Or should we just pick amongst the council and get this done.

From: Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Eclipse Planning Council private list <>
Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 5:54 PM
To: Eclipse Planning Council private list <>
Subject: Re: [] Luna+1 Poll Results

Bummer.... I thought Mercury was a good name too.

Mars and Mira were next on the list. Should we start with a run-off election with those two, or should we start the entire poll over again? Chris, what are your thoughts?


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Janet Campbell <janet.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Unfortunately, we will not be able to proceed with Mercury.   We’ll need to re-start the process to select a new name.






Janet Campbell

Director, Intellectual Property

Secretary and Legal Counsel

Eclipse Foundation, Inc.




From: Mike Milinkovich [mailto:mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: February-04-14 1:37 PM
To: Chris Aniszczyk; Eclipse Planning Council private list; Janet Campbell

Subject: Re: [] Luna+1 Poll Results


On 04/02/2014 1:21 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:

Any updates on this Mike as the Planning Council meets tomorrow!

The only update I can give at the moment is that Magellan is a definite no, and Mercury is probably a yes. We're waiting on one last check before we give the green light. Sorry we're not finalized, but it's not in our hands at the moment.

I suggest that the best the Planning Council can do at the moment is agree that as soon as the trademark review is passed by the EMO, that the approval for "Eclipse Mercury" is done.

Mike Milinkovich

_______________________________________________ mailing list

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484 |

Back to the top