Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Time for a run-off vote

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the applause :) but don't
think we can use our own fatigue to call off a run off ... my concern is
that we said we would have one, if there wasn't a clear majority, and I'd
fear some may have based their voting behavior on that. 

On the other hand, if you are saying,
that you think the Planning Council should choose Indigo over Ion even
if Ion won in a run-off vote ... well, then that'd be a different matter.
And the PC could vote here on this mailing list if that was your motion.


Thanks,

From:	Oisin Hurley <oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx>
To:	"eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	05/12/2010 05:15 PM
Subject:	Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Time for a run-off vote
Sent by:	eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

> -1, not that I'm on the council, but I'll try
to influence it anyway ;). But
> I'd say we've had enough votes. Indigo is clearly in the lead, and
I need a
> name now as we are planning the next release already and need a name
for it.

I'm kinda with Doug on this one - I don't think we need a run-off. David
has expended a whole heap of effort in doing the right thing for this
yearly chore (applause for him) and we may as well call a halt.

We could do a PR system next year for Eclipse JimJams :)

 --oh
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.