|RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council]RE: Eclipse Project AnnouncementandProject Review Schedule|
Process is the wrong word (sorry, my emotions are boiling over with this thing). I really mean plan. I have no idea what E4 is, which is disappointing to begin with. If it's much different than the current platform, that will probably accellerate interest in members adding resources to the current platform. We need to make sure those that want to, especially those that have attempted to in the past, can contribute to it. Doug S. -----Original Message----- From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 7:25 PM To: 'eclipse.org-architecture-council'; 'eclipse.org-planning-council' Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council]RE: Eclipse Project AnnouncementandProject Review Schedule > You're right, the planning council list may not be the best place, > certainly all the councils and the board itself need to be interested > in this. I can assure you that the board is fully informed of the E4 plans, as a briefing was given by the team at the December meeting. > If we're going to have two platforms, we'd better have the processes > in place to ensure they get the resourcing necessary to keep them both > alive. I am curious. (Really, honestly I am.) What would such a process look like? Every project at Eclipse is responsible for figuring out its own resourcing. Or they fail. Are you suggesting that should change? _______________________________________________ eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
Back to the top