Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] RE: Ec

[Thomas Hallgren <thomas@xxxxxxx>]

I used to work with the JRockit team at BEA so I asked them. Is their 
license is OK?

http://commerce.bea.com/products/weblogicjrockit/jrockit_eula.jsp

- thomas


Nick Boldt wrote:
> So, then, unless someone from BEA or Apache wants to help get theirs 
> on the stick, it looks like it's going to be a JVM-free experience 
> again this year. Still not the end of the world, of course, but it 
> would have been cool to have a fully-self-contained Eclipse Ganymede 
> w/ p2 installer on a stick.
>
> Nick
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 5:01 PM, Bjorn Freeman-Benson 
> <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Martin,
>     No, the Foundation is not comfortable with that license.
>
>     Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
> >     JRE Redist Licensing: Nick have you followed up with IBM?
> >       FYI, Sun appears to allow free redistribution of its
> >       JRE when it's unmodified and there is some value-add:
> >       http://java.sun.com/javase/faqs.jsp#Licensing
> >       http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/jre-1_5_0_14-license.txt
> >       Bjorn/Janet would such a license be acceptable for the EMO?
> >       
>     -- 
>     [end of message]
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
>     eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>