RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] A suggested topic for Planning Council Discussion |
lol. I picked the right day to “work”
at home ;) At any rate, we need some sort of organizational
answer to making requirements stick, or the exercise of defining them won’t
seem like a great use of time either. J. Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich Having the Planning
Council mailing list guess what the fiduciary responsibilities of the Board may
or may not be doesn’t seem like a great use of time. Trust me, this is
well worn ground. On the other hand,
it is Friday afternoon and the weather is gorgeous…. J How the conversation
got to here from the idea of defining and enforcing technical requirements for projects to participate in a
release just boggles my mind. From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Lewis Hi Doug, I’m not sure the Board would agree
that this isn’t about business.
At the end of the day the Board decides.
|