[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Re: EclipseCon Deciders Call

[Oisin Hurley <oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx>]

Alright, following up here on the oddities.

1276 SWTBot: A Very Short Introduction

https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1276

This guy was rolled into the SWTBot testing tutorial, as far as I can
recall, and there is a comment to that effect, so I'm going to remove
the 'accepted'.

Ketan - maybe you should drop this guy an email directly to see
what he wants to do?

1257 IBM pureQuery: leverging (sic) the DTP project to integrate
Java and SQL development

https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1257

1218 MOTODEV Studio for Android using Eclipse Data Tools
Project (DTP)

https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1218

These two are a little bit more awkward, since we have  no
other content for DTP :| (1157 is another lightning talk and accepted)

So it looks like something changed in the submission system between
the point where I pulled the lightning talks and when we started the
call. I was expecting to see email updates if something had changed,
but didn't see any, so assumed that we were good to go.

Options here:
    1. Keep both of these and remove two existing lightnings
    2. Keep one of these and remove one existing lightning
    3. Keep one of these and make it or 1157 a standard and remove
       one existing lightning

The question is are we comfortable having DTP, a top-level, project
although a bit slow at the moment, with just one lightning talk in total
representation?

I'll let you chew over that for a bit while I make some more tea.

 --oh