RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] EclipseCon2010 Conference

["Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes I do have an idea.  Let's not parallelize things we don't have to. 

For example, by putting tutorials on Mon, Tue and Wed (instead of Mon, Tue,
Wed and Thu) then I believe we reduce a number of parallelization conflicts.

We will never eliminate parallelized conflicts, but we can reduce them for
sure.

 - Don

-----Original Message-----
From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Sent: October 17, 2009 1:33 PM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] EclipseCon2010
Conference Call Agenda Items 07oct09

One solution would be to have a single track conference, but of course 
that means that we would have many many many fewer slots for talks, so 
that's probably not a good solution.

Donald - do you have any suggestions for how to avoid parallelizing 
things that should not be parallel given that we have to have things in 
parallel?

Donald Smith wrote:
> Consistently, year after
> year, people express great regret that we insist on parallelizing things
> that should not be.  
>   
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-comm
ittee