[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel update
|
Hi Philippe,
You realize there are 4 Long Talk slots for the Java track, right? Also,
don't forget to decline those not selected.
I think your idea below sounds interesting (as a panel?), though a bit late.
Thanks,
Rich
On 12/27/06 6:22 PM, "Philippe P Mulet" <philippe_mulet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, I just accepted 2 talks in the Java track (Java7, refactorings).
> Looking at the remaining contributions, I could see use for one extra slot
> if any.
>
> I don't think the panel decision will be made until after new year though.
>
> Matter for thoughts: One idea which got raised (but not submitted) was to
> discuss adding language features vs. capabilities to IDEs (think of aspectJ
> switching to annotations),
> e.g. APT (annotation processors as plugpable language extensions)
> e.g. AspectJ: from language additions to annotations
> e.g. JSR305: standardizing more annotation --> more IDE capabilities
> (@NonNull)
> e.g. static analysis : enforcing contracts (close stream after open) : SAFE
> typestate analysis
> Now, this isn't a Java specific topic... is this something which could be
> of more general interest, where someone from the Java world would discuss
> how annotations did help in this area ? And others could join ?
>
>
>
>
> Richard Gronback
> <richard.gronback
> @borland.com> To
> Sent by: "donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> eclipse.org-eclip Eclipsecon Program Committee list"
> secon-program-com <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
> mittee-bounces@ec mittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> lipse.org cc
>
> Subject
> 12/27/2006 08:35 Re:
> PM [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
> mittee] Long Talk & Panel update
>
> Please respond to
> Eclipsecon
> Program Committee
> list
> <eclipse.org-ecli
> psecon-program-co
> mmittee@eclipse.o
> rg>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is certainly an option. At the moment, I am aware of OSGi and Web
> tracks needing additional slots. It would be great to hear from others,
> and also to see more of the talks ACCEPTED (now at 36 of 68). I suspect
> with the holidays it may not be until after the new year (unfortunately).
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>
> On 12/22/06 10:46 AM, "Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Perhaps we could look at sessions that will almost certainly have a
> strong demand and/or a lot of interactivity and try to put them in
> the theater?
>
>
> From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
> Sent: December 21, 2006 10:59 AM
> To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk &
> Panel update
>
> Thanks, Doug.
>
> Bjorn and I, having given it some more thought, believe we should try
> to stick to having panels in the panel slots (and not reallocating to
> Long Talks). This is due to the fact that it¹s a theater space
> (better for panels than talks), and that we probably have enough
> interesting panels to fill them (e.g. Technology had 3 submissions
> that all seem reasonable).
>
> Thoughts on this? Also, are there talks you think might make a good
> panel?
>
> Best,
> Rich
>
>
> On 12/21/06 10:23 AM, "Doug Schaefer" <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey gang,
>
> I¹ve had no submissions for the C++ Panel. I can¹t think of an
> obvious one that would have immense value at this point other than
> multi-language but we are planning on doing that with the Tools
> panel. I¹d like to offer it back to the pool unless someone in the
> committee can think of a good reason not to.
>
>
> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:46 PM
> To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
> Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel
> update
>
> Hi All,
>
> It would be great to wrap up the majority of selections before the
> holidays, so if you¹re certain about those you¹d like to mark as
> ACCEPTED and DECLINED, now¹s the time. As mentioned before, this
> should make it much easier to decide on reallocations.
>
> Don¹t forget to about the declines (as tough as it may be), though
> leave your hopefuls set to NEW in case you receive more slots.
>
> Here¹s where we¹re at (allocated/accepted/submitted/declined):
>
> Track Long Talk Panel Comment
> Business 4/0/17/0 1/0/1/0
> C++ 2/2/5/3 1/0/0/0 Talks set
> Data 3/3/3/0 1/1/1/0 A perfect score! ;)
> Fundamentals 4/0/15/0 0/0/1/0 A panel in need of a slot
> Industry 2/0/3/0 1/0/1/0
> Java 4/0/11/0 1/0/2/0
> Mashup 2/0/8/0 1/0/1/0
> Mobile 5/4/6/0 1/0/1/0 Almost set
> Modeling 5/0/13/0 1/0/1/0 Ready to ACCEPT, discussion
> posted
> OSGi 2/0/15/0 1/0/2/0
> Reporting 5/0/10/0 1/0/0/0 Ready to ACCEPT, discussion
> posted
> RCP 4/0/21/0 1/0/0/0
> SOA 2/0/5/0 1/0/1/0
> Technology 6/6/25/19 1/0/3/0 Just need panel decision
> Test 4/4/12/8 1/0/1/0 Just need panel decision
> Tools 4/0/7/0 1/0/0/0
> Web 5/4/16/1 1/1/2/0 Almost set
>
> Recall there are 3 extra slots, and that we should be considering the
> overall program (more PC votes on ³foreign² tracks would be great!).
>
> Thanks!
> - Rich
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Richard C. Gronback
> Borland Software Corporation
> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-commit
> tee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-commit
> tee
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215
