[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel update
|
Well, I just accepted 2 talks in the Java track (Java7, refactorings).
Looking at the remaining contributions, I could see use for one extra slot
if any.
I don't think the panel decision will be made until after new year though.
Matter for thoughts: One idea which got raised (but not submitted) was to
discuss adding language features vs. capabilities to IDEs (think of aspectJ
switching to annotations),
e.g. APT (annotation processors as plugpable language extensions)
e.g. AspectJ: from language additions to annotations
e.g. JSR305: standardizing more annotation --> more IDE capabilities
(@NonNull)
e.g. static analysis : enforcing contracts (close stream after open) : SAFE
typestate analysis
Now, this isn't a Java specific topic... is this something which could be
of more general interest, where someone from the Java world would discuss
how annotations did help in this area ? And others could join ?
Richard Gronback
<richard.gronback
@borland.com> To
Sent by: "donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx,
eclipse.org-eclip Eclipsecon Program Committee list"
secon-program-com <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
mittee-bounces@ec mittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
lipse.org cc
Subject
12/27/2006 08:35 Re:
PM [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
mittee] Long Talk & Panel update
Please respond to
Eclipsecon
Program Committee
list
<eclipse.org-ecli
psecon-program-co
mmittee@eclipse.o
rg>
This is certainly an option. At the moment, I am aware of OSGi and Web
tracks needing additional slots. It would be great to hear from others,
and also to see more of the talks ACCEPTED (now at 36 of 68). I suspect
with the holidays it may not be until after the new year (unfortunately).
Thanks,
Rich
On 12/22/06 10:46 AM, "Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps we could look at sessions that will almost certainly have a
strong demand and/or a lot of interactivity and try to put them in
the theater?
From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
Sent: December 21, 2006 10:59 AM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk &
Panel update
Thanks, Doug.
Bjorn and I, having given it some more thought, believe we should try
to stick to having panels in the panel slots (and not reallocating to
Long Talks). This is due to the fact that it’s a theater space
(better for panels than talks), and that we probably have enough
interesting panels to fill them (e.g. Technology had 3 submissions
that all seem reasonable).
Thoughts on this? Also, are there talks you think might make a good
panel?
Best,
Rich
On 12/21/06 10:23 AM, "Doug Schaefer" <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey gang,
I’ve had no submissions for the C++ Panel. I can’t think of an
obvious one that would have immense value at this point other than
multi-language but we are planning on doing that with the Tools
panel. I’d like to offer it back to the pool unless someone in the
committee can think of a good reason not to.
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:46 PM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel
update
Hi All,
It would be great to wrap up the majority of selections before the
holidays, so if you’re certain about those you’d like to mark as
ACCEPTED and DECLINED, now’s the time. As mentioned before, this
should make it much easier to decide on reallocations.
Don’t forget to about the declines (as tough as it may be), though
leave your hopefuls set to NEW in case you receive more slots.
Here’s where we’re at (allocated/accepted/submitted/declined):
Track Long Talk Panel Comment
Business 4/0/17/0 1/0/1/0
C++ 2/2/5/3 1/0/0/0 Talks set
Data 3/3/3/0 1/1/1/0 A perfect score! ;)
Fundamentals 4/0/15/0 0/0/1/0 A panel in need of a slot
Industry 2/0/3/0 1/0/1/0
Java 4/0/11/0 1/0/2/0
Mashup 2/0/8/0 1/0/1/0
Mobile 5/4/6/0 1/0/1/0 Almost set
Modeling 5/0/13/0 1/0/1/0 Ready to ACCEPT, discussion
posted
OSGi 2/0/15/0 1/0/2/0
Reporting 5/0/10/0 1/0/0/0 Ready to ACCEPT, discussion
posted
RCP 4/0/21/0 1/0/0/0
SOA 2/0/5/0 1/0/1/0
Technology 6/6/25/19 1/0/3/0 Just need panel decision
Test 4/4/12/8 1/0/1/0 Just need panel decision
Tools 4/0/7/0 1/0/0/0
Web 5/4/16/1 1/1/2/0 Almost set
Recall there are 3 extra slots, and that we should be considering the
overall program (more PC votes on “foreign” tracks would be great!).
Thanks!
- Rich
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
