Re[2]: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel upda

[Peter Kriens <Peter.Kriens@xxxxxxxxx>]

My choices ...

   3661 R-OSGi
   3702 Enterprise OSGi

If I get an extra slot I'd like to nominate:

   3705 Using OSGi in the back-end

For a panel I'd like to have the following long talk as the input:

   3859 OSGi, The Good, the Bad, the Ugly,
   3696 Easing into Equinox

Can I just accept the talks now?

Kind regards,

     Peter Kriens


RG>   
RG>  This is certainly an option.  At the moment, I am aware of OSGi
RG> and Web tracks needing additional slots.  It would be great to
RG> hear from others, and also to see more of the talks ACCEPTED (now
RG> at 36 of 68).  I suspect with the holidays it may not be until
RG> after the new year (unfortunately).
RG>  
RG>  Thanks,
RG>  Rich 
RG>  
RG>  
RG>  On 12/22/06 10:46 AM, "Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RG>  
RG>  
RG> Perhaps we could look at sessions that will almost certainly have
RG> a strong demand and/or a lot of interactivity and try to put them in the theater?
RG>   
RG>  
RG>  From:
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
RG>  Sent: December 21, 2006 10:59 AM
RG>  To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
RG>  Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel update
RG>   
RG>  Thanks, Doug.
RG>  
RG>  Bjorn and I, having given it some more thought, believe we
RG> should try to stick to having panels in the panel slots (and not
RG> reallocating to Long Talks).  This is due to the fact that it’s a
RG> theater space (better for panels than talks), and that we probably
RG> have enough interesting panels to fill them (e.g. Technology had 3
RG> submissions that all seem reasonable).
RG>  
RG>  Thoughts on this?  Also, are there talks you think might make a good panel?
RG>  
RG>  Best,
RG>  Rich
RG>  
RG>  
RG>  On 12/21/06 10:23 AM, "Doug Schaefer" <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
RG>  Hey gang,
RG>   
RG>  I’ve had no submissions for the C++ Panel. I can’t think of an
RG> obvious one that would have immense value at this point other than
RG> multi-language but we are planning on doing that with the Tools
RG> panel. I’d like to offer it back to the pool unless someone in the
RG> committee can think of a good reason not to.
RG>   
RG>  
RG>  Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
RG>  Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member  
RG>  

RG>  
RG>  
RG>  From:
RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Gronback
RG>  Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:46 PM
RG>  To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
RG>  Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel update
RG>  
RG>  Hi All,
RG>  
RG>  It would be great to wrap up the majority of selections before
RG> the holidays, so if you’re certain about those you’d like to mark
RG> as ACCEPTED and DECLINED, now’s the time.  As mentioned before,
RG> this should make it much easier to decide on reallocations. 
RG>  
RG>  Don’t forget to about the declines (as tough as it may be),
RG> though leave your hopefuls set to NEW in case you receive more slots.  
RG>  
RG>  Here’s where we’re at (allocated/accepted/submitted/declined):
RG>  
RG>  Track         Long Talk  Panel      Comment
RG>  Business      4/0/17/0   1/0/1/0    
RG>  C++           2/2/5/3    1/0/0/0    Talks set
RG>  Data          3/3/3/0    1/1/1/0    A perfect score! ;)
RG>  Fundamentals  4/0/15/0   0/0/1/0    A panel in need of a slot   
RG>  Industry      2/0/3/0    1/0/1/0    
RG>  Java          4/0/11/0   1/0/2/0    
RG>  Mashup        2/0/8/0    1/0/1/0    
RG>  Mobile        5/4/6/0    1/0/1/0    Almost set
RG>  Modeling      5/0/13/0   1/0/1/0    Ready to ACCEPT, discussion posted
RG>  OSGi          2/0/15/0   1/0/2/0    
RG>  Reporting     5/0/10/0   1/0/0/0    Ready to ACCEPT, discussion posted
RG>  RCP           4/0/21/0   1/0/0/0            
RG>  SOA           2/0/5/0    1/0/1/0
RG>  Technology    6/6/25/19  1/0/3/0    Just need panel decision
RG>  Test          4/4/12/8   1/0/1/0    Just need panel decision
RG>  Tools         4/0/7/0    1/0/0/0    
RG>  Web           5/4/16/1   1/1/2/0    Almost set        
RG>  
RG>  Recall there are 3 extra slots, and that we should be
RG> considering the overall program (more PC votes on “foreign” tracks would be great!).
RG>  
RG>  Thanks!
RG>  - Rich
RG>  
RG>  
RG>  


RG>  
RG>  -- 
RG>  Richard C. Gronback
RG>  Borland Software Corporation
RG>  richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG>  +1 860 227 9215
RG>   
RG>    

-- 
Peter Kriens                              Tel +33467542167
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry                    AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
34160 Beaulieu, France                    ICQ 255570717
Skype pkriens                             Fax +1 8153772599