Re: [eclipse.org-committers] GitHub Actions CI Jobs

[Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx>]

Adam,

 

I saw similar Problems with Travis-CI used by some Eclipse Projects especially on the Jakarta EE side, but while I use GH actions for a few other Open Source Projects like OpenDDR the Eclipse Projects I lead or actively contribute to mostly use Jenkins build Jobs, thus are not affected by These restrictions.

 

Regards,

Werner

 

Von: Adam Gibson
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. April 2021 09:11
An: Werner Keil
Cc: Mikael Barbero; Marc Nuri; marc.nuri@xxxxxxxxxx; eclipse.org-committers@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [eclipse.org-committers] GitHub Actions CI Jobs

 

Hey folks:

I'm noticing some throttling in GH actions:

2021-04-01T05:49:32.9018891Z ##[section]Starting: Request a runner to run this job

2021-04-01T05:49:33.1592308Z Can't find any online and idle self-hosted runner in current repository that matches the required labels: 'ubuntu-16.04'

2021-04-01T05:49:33.1592429Z Can't find any online and idle self-hosted runner in current repository's account/organization that matches the required labels: 'ubuntu-16.04'

2021-04-01T05:49:33.1592791Z Found online and idle hosted runner in current repository's account/organization that matches the required labels: 'ubuntu-16.04'

2021-04-01T05:49:33.2934997Z ##[section]Finishing: Request a runner to run this job

I assume this will fix itself eventually, but I was wondering if anyone else saw similar issues.

Thanks,

Adam

 

 

 

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 2:42 AM Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx> wrote:

That’s a very good Point.

 

And while some Sound like they know what they’re doing, others like JFrog/Bintray/JCenter seem to make up their mind and even try to compete with most of These at the same time.

Jenkins and Cloudbees also started to restrict free use of ist Cloud instances to a Point where it was unbearable, especially to more mature Projects that do not see a Code Change and push or build every 10 or 14 days when those Projects became stalled and the CI instance would go away.

 

Cheers,

Werner

 

Von: Mikael Barbero
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2021 16:48
An: Marc Nuri
Cc: marc.nuri@xxxxxxxxxx; eclipse.org-committers@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [eclipse.org-committers] GitHub Actions CI Jobs

 

 

As a side note, if I'm not mistaken, the 2000min/mo limitation only applies to private repos, the problem here is the concurrency limit which does apply to every repository (public or private).

 

I stand corrected. Thanks for the heads up. Details are on yet another page https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/usage-limits-billing-and-administration#about-billing-for-github-actions

 

However, free resources for Open Source projects are generally generous in the beginning and then get restrictions at some point. See the following examples from the past few months only:

 

• Travis CI: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing and https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2020/travis-cis-new-pricing-plan-threw-wrench-my-open-source-works
• Azure pipeline: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/devops/change-in-azure-pipelines-grant-for-public-projects/
• Docker Hub: https://www.docker.com/blog/scaling-docker-to-serve-millions-more-developers-network-egress/ and https://www.docker.com/blog/scaling-dockers-business-to-serve-millions-more-developers-storage/
• Bintray, JCenter: https://jfrog.com/blog/into-the-sunset-bintray-jcenter-gocenter-and-chartcenter/ 

 

Given the trend, I would think twice before going all in with some similar attractive offering for a business critical project. IMHO ;)

 

Cheers,

Mikaël Barbero 

Manager — Release Engineering and Technology | Eclipse Foundation

🐦 @mikbarbero

Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration

 

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-committers mailing list
eclipse.org-committers@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-committers