Maybe the C++ one is a better example. We have a tonne of optional
features for the CDT that aren¹t included in the C++ package. We need to
find a better way to present these to users and the Marketplace is a great
option.
Doug.
On 2015-05-01, 4:42 PM, "Marcel Bruch" <marcel.bruch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I¹ve no opinion or proposals yet but I¹ve some trouble to contrast this
approach with the existing EPP packages and (elsewhere discussed)
Oomph-based standard profiles.
More concrete:
Can you elaborate how, for instance, the Java Developer Tools Feature on
the Marketplace will be different to EPP Java package?
Bug 459905 sounds like this. Thus, I¹m missing the key motivation for
this step. I assume that you are looking for a greater flexibility than
we have today with EPP. Is this the main motivation?
Will EPP packages disappear some time soon?
Thanks,
Marcel
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you
must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.